Fathers Seven-year delay in Court Case?

Manifold & Alderton [2021] FamCAFC 61 (4 May 2021) (Strickland, Kent & Austin JJ)

Appeal – ‘gross and deplorable’ seven-year delay in handing down judgment ‘contributed to the making of substantial errors’

In Manifold & Alderton [2021] FamCAFC 61 (4 May 2021), the Full Court heard a father’s appeal from parenting and property orders made in September 2020, where the trial concluded seven years earlier.

After a trial in 2013, further evidence was taken in March 2018, after which judgment was reserved again. A further hearing occurred in September 2019.

Strickland J, with whom Kent & Austin JJ agreed, said (from [36]):

“… [D]elay is not itself a ground of appeal, [but] the authorities are clear that where there is delay, the reasons for judgment must be subject to the strictest of scrutiny …

[37] Here … the focus is … the failure by the primary judge to take relevant matters into account, to engage with the father’s case and with the evidence, and to provide adequate reasons …

[52] … [H]er Honour concludes … that it is in the best interests of the children … to marginally increase [paternal] … time …

[53] The only basis for that decision … are a query ‘whether the father has the capacity to adequately support the children’ … and that the father has not ‘demonstrated’ how he would attend to the support needed …

[54] … [T]hese are all matters … addressed in the evidence, but which evidence was overlooked and clearly not taken into account …

[55] This is significant given the extraordinary delay here. … [H]er Honour was required to carry out a more detailed consideration of the evidence, and analysis of the respective cases … than would normally be required. The purpose of doing so would be to demonstrate … that the delay had not affected the decision. That did not occur here.


[61] … [T]here is no mention by her Honour of any difficulty experienced … as a result of the loss of the file and the exhibits. There being nothing said … to explain how she overcame the absence of these documents … provides another basis for finding that that decision is unsafe. … ”Advertisement

The case was remitted for rehearing and costs certificates were ordered.

Table of Contents

Scroll to Top
Book initial consultation

Share your family matter with us and we will call you.

If your matter is urgent, please call us on (07) 5408 4470

Shanahan Family Law are hiring!

"Join our Sunshine Coast family law service"

If you have questions about this role, please call our office for a confidential chat (07) 5408 4470